Investment management consultant Investit launched the Research and Execution Spending Survey, enabling investment management firms to compare what they each pay for research and execution.
The survey gives managers the information to negotiate external research costs, demonstrate careful commission management to clients (and regulators) and compare the consumption of research by their analysts.
As Paul Myners explained in his 2001 review, “an important cost for institutions, namely broking commission, is subject to insufficient scrutiny.” Subsequent unbundling legislation, PS05/9, separated the payment for external research from execution. But the external research market remains very opaque. Brokers providing research are paid from execution linked commission negotiated separately with each manager. Brokers have proved unwilling to publish price lists. There is regulatory pressure to make this research market more transparent, as investment management firms’ clients ultimately pick up the bill.
Investit has developed its Research and Execution Spending Survey in conjunction with a panel of investment management firms. The survey gathers information from participating investment management firms on the cost of the external research they buy and benchmarks this against their peers. It also gathers information on what is paid for different types of execution services and research inputs. The survey methodology is based on that of Investit’s market-leading IT Value Survey.
“Fund managers and the FSA have been looking for a market-led solution to make the market in services bought from brokers with client commission more transparent,” says Richard Phillipson, principal consultant at Investit. “This survey helps meet that need. Fund managers can now compare what is paid for a range of broker services with what their peers are paying. Up until now only the brokers knew what all the managers were spending; this helps close the information gap.”